On Mon, Jul 13, 2009 at 12:38 PM, Aurelien Jarno<aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > The GFDL instead is not considered non-free, but the GFDL *with* > invariant sections is considered non-free.
Sorry, I don't follow, I assume you meant to write "free" somwhere instead of "non-free?" Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org
