On Wed, May 26, 2010 at 09:03:10PM +0200, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > On Tue, May 25, 2010 at 03:10:49PM +0200, Iker Salmón San Millán wrote: > > I am sorry, i am messing it up with the [email protected]. I am starting > > to underestand how works the bugs list. > > > > i guess i have to send to you my emails (just in this case with this bug) > > ???? > > To me and [email protected]. Usually a reply to all works. > > > Ok, rebooting and regenerating locales with #locale-gen solved the problem. > > I don't know what caused the first error, maybe the order of configuring the > > packages upgraded? > > The order of the packages should not have any effect, especially given > the upstream version is the same before and after the upgrade. > > > I am sorry i did not try to regenerate the locales without rebooting, i > > don't know if it was really necesary rebooting the system. > > The log you sent in the bug report clearly show that the content of the > file was corrupted. OTOH, the content of the file seemed to be correct > before you reboot (at least from the md5sum). > > I have no idea what could have caused that. >
Actually it may come from new dpkg features. Do you know which version of dpkg was installed at the time of the problem? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
