* Steve Langasek (vor...@debian.org) [110223 22:53]: > We can handle this one of two ways. We can either bump the minimal > dependency of *all* packages against libc, by adjusting shlibs/symbols in > the eglibc package; or we can make adding the dependency a part of the > standard library multiarchification recipe.
Or third, we could add the new path to eglibc in a stable point update and into unstable, and either a) have a virtual package provided, and for the core utilities pre-depend on that virtual package (so that user systems are never broken by the upgrade), or b) don't multiarch the core utilities for the next stable release. Andi -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110223230318.gy15...@mails.so.argh.org
