From: Denis Barbier <[email protected]>
Date: Sun, 28 May 2006 14:46:52 -0500

Of zh_CN  zh_HK  zh_SG  zh_TW, zh_TW is the only one to use
"<U897F><U5143>" (xi1yuan2 "western year system").

I'd would say dump it. If one wants to use ROC years, have them
specially mark that instead. No need for "A.D.", gong1yuan2, etc.

No response from Hsieh. But mainly
http://pinyin.info/news/2006/taiwan-premier-backs-adoption-of-common-years/

Taiwan may drop idiosyncratic Republican calendar,
http://www.taipeitimes.com/News/front/archives/2006/02/25/2003294523

Premier backs replacing ROC dating system
http://chinapost.com.tw/detail.asp?ID=77579&GRP=A

And even if they don't, there is still no reason for attaching "xiyuan".

Fixes: http://bugs.debian.org/352600
Requested-by: 積丹尼 <[email protected]>
Signed-off-by: Jonathan Nieder <[email protected]>
---
 localedata/locales/zh_TW |    4 ++--
 1 files changed, 2 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)

diff --git a/localedata/locales/zh_TW b/localedata/locales/zh_TW
index eac0228..fdd51d3 100644
--- a/localedata/locales/zh_TW
+++ b/localedata/locales/zh_TW
@@ -107,13 +107,13 @@ mon       
"<U4E00><U6708>";"<U4E8C><U6708>";"<U4E09><U6708>";/
        "<U5341><U6708>";"<U5341><U4E00><U6708>";"<U5341><U4E8C><U6708>"
 
 % d_t_fmt: "%Y<y>%m<m>%d<d> (%A) %H<hr>%M<m>%S<s>"
-d_t_fmt "<U897F><U5143><U0025><U0059><U5E74>/
+d_t_fmt "<U0025><U0059><U5E74>/
 <U0025><U006D><U6708><U0025><U0064><U65E5>/
 <U0020><U0028><U0025><U0041><U0029>/
 <U0020><U0025><U0048><U6642>/
 <U0025><U004D><U5206><U0025><U0053><U79D2>"
 
-d_fmt  "<U897F><U5143><U0025><U0059><U5E74>/
+d_fmt  "<U0025><U0059><U5E74>/
 <U0025><U006D><U6708><U0025><U0064><U65E5>"
 
 t_fmt  "<U0025><U0048><U6642><U0025><U004D><U5206><U0025><U0053><U79D2>"
-- 
1.7.5.1


--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected]
Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20110514103442.GQ6364@elie

Reply via email to