On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 09:52:36PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 22:43 +0100, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On Sat, Jan 28, 2012 at 03:09:49PM +0000, Ben Hutchings wrote: > > > On Sat, 2012-01-28 at 13:41 +0100, Émeric Maschino wrote: > > > > Hello Ben, > > > > > > > > IIRC, to completely fix this issue, (e)glibc must be recompiled > > > > against updated kernel. > > > > Is there a bug report to track this? > > > > Do you know when this updated (e)glibc is planned? > > > > > > I'm not aware that there is a bug report on eglibc regarding this. > > > > > > I believe that only a binNMU is required, i.e. a request for a automatic > > > rebuild. I'll leave that to the maintainers to decide. > > > > > > > I am planning an upload probably tomorrow. That said, I don't know what > > is the exact problem, so i don't know if it is going to be fixed with a > > rebuild. > > accept4() was not implemented by Linux on ia64 for a long time. I > believe eglibc will define the C wrapper automatically when built > against the updated linux-libc-dev. >
Yes, it should probably work. Should I bump the build-dep on linux-libc-dev to a recent version (in that case which version?). -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
