tag 666760 - patch thanks On Sat, Jun 02, 2012 at 04:36:03PM +0200, Thibaut Girka wrote: > tags 666760 patch > thanks > > Hi, > I was wondering why libc6-dev wasn't m-a: same, and I've decided to identify > which files > are arch-dependent but not in arch-qualified paths. > > > Here is what I've found using libc6-dev=2.13-32 binary packages from the > archive: > > Searching for conflicts across the following architectures: > amd64, armel, armhf, i386, m68k, mips, mipsel, powerpc, s390, s390x, > sh4, sparc, sparc64 >
Your patch actually also makes libc0.1-dev, libc0.3-dev and libc6.1-dev m-a: same. You should also check for files in these packages. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 1024D/F1BCDB73 aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: http://lists.debian.org/20120602190254.gb13...@hall.aurel32.net
