On Sunday, June 10, 2012 02:28:55 AM Aurelien Jarno wrote: > Your changes are quite invasive and remove plenty of needed patches or > code. It's fine if your goal is only to get an x32 package, but in that > case please make it clear in the version number.
Point taken -- I'll make sure to include "+x32" somewhere in the version number on the next build. Yes, this was meant as a preliminary build to get a working x32 package, without having to merge all the Debian patches into a new upstream version. I was more interested in any comments on the x32-specific parts. -- Daniel Schepler -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
