On Mon, Aug 27, 2012 at 8:28 AM, Tomas Dohnalek <[email protected]> wrote: > I have started to work on automation of comparing outputs from glibc > testsuite, because of pointless manual work when new version arrives and we > want to do as much as possible in upstream. In the beginning of the > improvement process, we want to add simple one-line PASS/FAIL output for > each test and also apart from usual `make check` add `make installcheck` > rule for testing system binaries. > > I guess, that you are having the same difficulties so I want to ask, how do > you deal with current state? Have you made any internal tool for comparing > results or are you doing it manually? > > Hopefully I will soon send first initial patch to upstream, but first I want > to know that I am not exploring the wheel and I want to know your > opinions/objections concerning this intention. > > All suggestions are welcomed.
As an upstream maintainer I have no objection to this kind of work e.g. PASS/FAIL markers for each test (of which there can be many within a single test executable). I look forward to seeing your proposal upstream. Cheers, Carlos. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: http://lists.debian.org/cadzpyiwzjgydv43xgdkq3k5hgdja_m1n0m7r4g5hqf+xgpy...@mail.gmail.com
