Your message dated Wed, 17 Sep 2014 23:05:30 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#720777: libc6-x32: /usr/local/libx32 (required by FHS) 
doesn't exist
has caused the Debian Bug report #720777,
regarding libc6-x32: /usr/local/libx32 (required by FHS) doesn't exist
to be marked as done.

This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.

(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)


-- 
720777: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=720777
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc6-x32
Version: 2.17-92
Severity: normal

The libc6-x32 package provides the /libx32 and /usr/libx32 directories,
but the /usr/local/libx32 doesn't exist. The FHS[*] says:

  If directories /lib<qual> or /usr/lib<qual> exist, the equivalent
  directories must also exist in /usr/local.
              ^^^^

[*] http://www.pathname.com/fhs/pub/fhs-2.3.html

-- System Information:
Debian Release: jessie/sid
  APT prefers unstable
  APT policy: (500, 'unstable'), (500, 'testing'), (500, 'stable'), (1, 
'experimental')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386

Kernel: Linux 3.10-2-amd64 (SMP w/2 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=POSIX, LC_CTYPE=en_US.UTF-8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash

Versions of packages libc6-x32 depends on:
ii  libc6  2.17-92

libc6-x32 recommends no packages.

libc6-x32 suggests no packages.

-- no debconf information

--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On Sun, Aug 25, 2013 at 02:46:14PM +0200, Vincent Lefevre wrote:
> Package: libc6-x32
> Version: 2.17-92
> Severity: normal
> 
> The libc6-x32 package provides the /libx32 and /usr/libx32 directories,
> but the /usr/local/libx32 doesn't exist. The FHS[*] says:
> 
>   If directories /lib<qual> or /usr/lib<qual> exist, the equivalent
>   directories must also exist in /usr/local.
>               ^^^^

The Debian Policy 3.9.6 now explicitly allows the /usr/local/lib<qual>
to not exist, I am therefore closing this bug.

-- 
Aurelien Jarno                          GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected]                 http://www.aurel32.net

--- End Message ---

Reply via email to