On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 03:31:33PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote: > On Thu, Sep 18, 2014 at 10:18 AM, Aurelien Jarno <aurel...@aurel32.net> wrote: > > On Wed, Sep 17, 2014 at 11:55:01PM -0700, Ben Longbons wrote: > > This is a known problem, but there is no way to define cross-architecture > > conflicts with the current dependencies system, and the conflicts/provides > > doesn't work either as long as we keep providing biarch or triarch > > packages. This bug is therefore not going to be fixed until a technical > > solution is found. > > Can't you just: > * split out ld.so into a separate debian package whose name depends on > the actual path
That's not something possible, we don't want to break systems. -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B aurel...@aurel32.net http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to debian-glibc-requ...@lists.debian.org with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact listmas...@lists.debian.org Archive: https://lists.debian.org/20140918230319.gc14...@hall.aurel32.net
