On 2015-01-31 11:16, Olaf van der Spek wrote: > That's what I thought, but I don't think the security update mentions that. > Shouldn't it be mentioned somewhere?
Maybe it should have been mentionned in the security advisory indeed. > IIRC some updates also offered to restart affected services > semi-automatically, why was that not the case with this update? Because virtually everything is affected, how do you draw the line on what has to be restarted or not? -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [email protected] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [email protected] Archive: https://lists.debian.org/[email protected]
