On 2015-10-28 15:39, Ondřej Surý wrote: > Hi Aurelien, > > On Wed, Oct 28, 2015, at 14:30, Aurelien Jarno wrote: > > On 2015-10-28 13:03, Debian Bug Tracking System wrote: > > > Processing commands for [email protected]: > > > > > > > reopen 776391 > > > Bug #776391 {Done: "Interfax" <[email protected]>} [eglibc] > > > [CVE-2015-0235]: heap-based buffer overflow in > > > __nss_hostname_digits_dots() > > > 'reopen' may be inappropriate when a bug has been closed with a version; > > > all fixed versions will be cleared, and you may need to re-add them. > > > Bug reopened > > > No longer marked as fixed in versions 2.11.3-4+deb6u4, 2.18-1, and > > > 2.13-38+deb7u7. > > > > thanks > > > Stopping processing here. > > > > Could you please explain why you believe this bug is still present? > > it was closed by spam and the last action was tagging it squeeze,wheezy? > So perhaps I was just confused by the double closing, in that case, I > appologize.
Sorry, I haven't seen the spam in my mbox as it has been filtered somewhere. The bug is really fixed in squeeze, wheezy, jessie, and so on and marked as such in the BTS, however it was indeed not formally closed. I don't really know the difference between a bug marked fixed in all versions and a bug closed, except maybe that it get archived in the latter case. Aurelien -- Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B [email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
