Your message dated Sun, 17 Apr 2016 17:23:27 +0200
with message-id <[email protected]>
and subject line Re: Bug#818304: tzdata-java: Removal of tzdata-java in tzdata
2016b-1 makes openjdk-7 uninstallable
has caused the Debian Bug report #818304,
regarding tzdata-java: Removal of tzdata-java in tzdata 2016b-1 makes openjdk-7
uninstallable
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact [email protected]
immediately.)
--
818304: http://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=818304
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact [email protected] with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: tzdata-java
Version: 2016a-1
Severity: normal
Dear Maintainer,
in tzdata 2016b1, tzdata-java was removed. openjdk-7 is now uninstallable on
unstable because openjdk-7-jre-headless depends on tzdata-java.
Please restore tzdata-java so that openjdk-7 can be installed on unstable.
Kind regards,
Ben.
-- System Information:
Debian Release: stretch/sid
APT prefers unstable
APT policy: (500, 'unstable')
Architecture: amd64 (x86_64)
Foreign Architectures: i386
Kernel: Linux 4.4.0-1-amd64 (SMP w/4 CPU cores)
Locale: LANG=en_GB.utf8, LC_CTYPE=en_GB.utf8 (charmap=UTF-8)
Shell: /bin/sh linked to /bin/dash
Init: systemd (via /run/systemd/system)
Versions of packages tzdata-java depends on:
ii tzdata 2016a-1
tzdata-java recommends no packages.
tzdata-java suggests no packages.
-- debconf-show failed
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
On 2016-03-16 08:54, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> On 16/03/16 08:46, Aurelien Jarno wrote:
> >On 2016-03-16 08:02, Ben Caradoc-Davies wrote:
> >>Please restore tzdata-java so that openjdk-7 can be installed on unstable.
> >
> >We can't do that. The support to build tzdata-java seems to have been
> >removed from openjdk, that's why we had to stop building it. Anyway it
> >seems that openjdk-7 will be removed soon given the bugs that have been
> >opened:
> >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814157
> >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814159
> >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814165
> >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814167
> >- https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=814174
> >
> >Now it would be could if openjdk people can actually comment on that.
> >
> >Aurelien
>
> Thanks, Aurelien. If the OpenJDK team intends the immediate removal of
> openjdk-7 from unstable, that would resolve both #818304 and #818308. I did
> not see anything in transitions. I am not sure how this change is announced.
openjdk-7 has been removed from unstable, I am therefore closing the
bug.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
[email protected] http://www.aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
