Your message dated Fri, 14 Jul 2023 18:23:12 +0200
with message-id <ZLF2cP/v5mvc+...@aurel32.net>
and subject line Closing kfreebsd specific bugs
has caused the Debian Bug report #739281,
regarding provides sendfile() prototype (in <sys/sendfile.h>) but no sendfile
symbol
to be marked as done.
This means that you claim that the problem has been dealt with.
If this is not the case it is now your responsibility to reopen the
Bug report if necessary, and/or fix the problem forthwith.
(NB: If you are a system administrator and have no idea what this
message is talking about, this may indicate a serious mail system
misconfiguration somewhere. Please contact ow...@bugs.debian.org
immediately.)
--
739281: https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=739281
Debian Bug Tracking System
Contact ow...@bugs.debian.org with problems
--- Begin Message ---
Package: libc0.1-dev
Severity: normal
Perhaps we could use emulated Linux-like sendfile() from Eric Wong. See:
On 17/02/2014 09:12, Eric Wong wrote:
> Robert Millan <r...@debian.org> wrote:
>> If you can write a Linux-compatible sendfile() which uses BSD-ish
>> SYS_sendfile
>> as backend, I guess they'll have no problem exporting a new symbol in glibc?
>> After all, it's glibc who claims to provide it (via <sys/sendfile.h>).
>
> I emulate Linux sendfile on (non-Debian) FreeBSD that way in cmogstored.
> Feel free to grab the linux_sendfile() wrapper from cmogstored:
> http://bogomips.org/cmogstored.git/plain/http_get.c
> The linux_sendfile wrapper is trivial and I'm OK with relicensing from
> the existing GPLv3+ to any DFSG-approved license
--
Robert Millan
--- End Message ---
--- Begin Message ---
Starting with glibc 2.37-6 the support for kfreebsd has been dropped for
the packaging (it has been broken for many years). Let's close the
corresponding bugs.
--
Aurelien Jarno GPG: 4096R/1DDD8C9B
aurel...@aurel32.net http://aurel32.net
--- End Message ---
