Internal

On Fri, 30 Oct 2026 08:35:55 +0100 Aurelien Jarno <[email protected]> wrote:

> Thanks for the bug report and the reproducer. This corresponds to
> upstream bug BZ#27458, which already got a fixed in master:
> https://sourceware.org/bugzilla/show_bug.cgi?id=27458

Thanks, haven’t found that, but it reads like this is the exact issue we’re 
seeing.


> The bug was opened for for more than 5 years until someone reported a
> similar issue using WSL2. I noticed that you also use WSL2. I am not
> sure if it is a coincidence or if there is some application on WSL2 that
> is affected by this bug.

We’re using WSL2 only for development purposes, so it is a lucky coincidence 
that it matches with the other reporter(s).
The reproducer also fails on native systems like arm64 or x86_64, so it’s not a 
WSL2 specific issue.


> Do you mind providing a bit more details on how you found this bug and
> what are the consequences, it might also help to decide if this bug
> needs to be fixed in trixie or not, as it is technically not a
> regression from bookworm or even bullseye.

The bug was found by unit tests bound to a mutex wrapper layer in our code base.
As this wrapper is totally under our control, it’s easy for us to apply a 
workaround in a central place:
- Replace the affected pthread_mutex_trylock() call with e.g. 
pthread_mutex_clocklock() waiting on an already expired timeout.

So after all, from my pov, we are good with the workaround and happy when a 
proper fix appears per upstream path for the next Debian major version.



Thanks so far for your help!

Mit freundlichen Grüßen / Kind regards

i. A. Tobias Schülein
Team Leader OS RT System
R&D ASF

KUKA Deutschland GmbH   Zugspitzstraße 140, 86165 Augsburg / Germany   
www.kuka.com<http://www.kuka.com/>
[email protected]<mailto:[email protected]>   T +49 821 797‑3925





KUKA Deutschland GmbH   Board of Directors: Michael Jürgens (Chairman), Johan 
Naten, Hui Zhang   Registered Office: Augsburg HRB 14914

This e-mail may contain confidential and/or privileged information. If you are 
not the intended recipient (or have received this e-mail in error) please 
notify the sender immediately and destroy this e-mail. Any unauthorized 
copying, disclosure or distribution of contents of this e-mail is strictly 
forbidden.

Please consider the environment before printing this e-mail.

Reply via email to