On Tuesday, 2 February 2021 4:18:02 PM AEDT Anthony Fok wrote: > Would both podman 2 and podman 3 be a possibility? > I.e., we could keep the existing "podman" package at 2.1.1, while > creating a new "podman3" or "podman-3" package? > > Feasible solution? :-)
IMHO definitely not worth the effort...
It is only a matter of one upstream bug...
--
Best wishes,
Dmitry Smirnov
GPG key : 4096R/52B6BBD953968D1B
---
There is no such thing as public opinion. There is only published opinion.
-- Winston Churchill
---
COVID-19 (excess) mortalities: viral cause impossible—drugs with key role
in about 200,000 extra deaths in Europe and the US alone
https://realnewsaustralia.com/2020/10/01/covid-19-excess-mortalities-viral-cause-impossible-drugs-with-key-role-in-about-200000-extra-deaths-in-europe-and-the-us-alone/
signature.asc
Description: This is a digitally signed message part.
