On Tue, 20 Apr 2021 at 23:31, Micheal Waltz <[email protected]> wrote:
> On Tue, Apr 20, 2021 at 11:18:01PM +0530, Nilesh Patra wrote: > > > Looking through the packaging docs[2], I found the syntax for dual > license > > > is, > > > > > > Files: rr/* > > > Copyright: 2020 makeworld <[email protected]> > > > License: GPL-3+ or Expat > > > > > > > It should be "GPL-3 or MIT" there should not be a "+", since the license > is > > GPL-3 and not GPL-3 and beyond > > More for understanding here, but in the copyright documentation [1], > it says, > > "There are many versions of the MIT license. Please use Expat instead, > when it matches." > Sure, I could have used Expat here. > Does it really matter that much if MIT or Expat is the name if the text > is included as well? More want to know going forward for other packages > as it seems a bit ambiguous. > Nah, does not matter too much. If the license provided matches the verbatim copy of Expat, use Expat. We should be fine for now I guess. > > Admittedly, I saw this mail after I made the change myself and pushed, > > please have a look at my commits. > > > > I did changes that I considered sensible and uploaded to NEW. Thanks a > lot > > for your work on this :-) > > Awesome! I looked over the changes and all seem reasonable, thank you > very much for your help! > \o/ Nilesh
