On 6/8/21 3:20 PM, Peymaneh Nejad wrote: > I have packaged two dependencies for caddy, maybe someone wants to have a > look at them? > > first is golang-github-masterminds-goutils: > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-masterminds-goutils/-/commits/debian/sid > > i don't have the rights to change the default salsa branch to debian/sid, > hence the odd link. maybe someone with the proper rights can do that? > I am also not sure if I can/should tidy up the obsolete branches like master, > pristine-tar and so on and how to deal with the "upstream" branch: it is not > a tracking branch of the upstream code and therefore my local upstream branch > would get rejected..
How did you import it? For me this seems to work just fine $ uscan -dd $ gbp import-orig ../golang-github-masterminds-goutils_1.1.1.orig.tar.gz $ git checkout upstream $ git log --oneline | head -1 c1da3a2 New upstream version 1.1.1 Once you fix the debian/sid branch and inline it with upstream, I'll remove master and pristine-tar after verifying locally that your changes work ofcourse > second is golang-github-masterminds-sprig: > https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-masterminds-sprig > > the latter depends on the first, and it also depends on a recent version of > golang-github-masterminds-semver-dev which unfortunately is in the repos but > not the needed version. > For now I have feild a bug > (https://bugs.debian.org/cgi-bin/bugreport.cgi?bug=989594) > and did a quick (& a bit dirty) fork so one could test the build until this > is resolved: > https://salsa.debian.org/peymaneh/golang-github-masterminds-semver-dev/-/commits/master/ Fair enough. I suppose we can upload golang-github-masterminds-semver-dev version 3.x.y to experimental for the moment, and you do all your work by pulling this from experimental. What say? > Another small question regarding the two packages: I have omitted the > "upstream-contact"-field in d/copyright because> 1. I couldn't find one and In such cases, you can simply link to the issue tracker of that repo as upstream contact. That's a way of reaching upstream developers too, right? See here for example: https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/packages/golang-github-brentp-irelate/-/blob/debian/sid/debian/copyright#L3 > 2. saw that some other packages also did not include the field. That doesn't sound very convincing ;-P > Lintian didn't complain but I am still not sure if this is correct. Righto. See above :-) Let me know if you have any confusion still Nilesh
signature.asc
Description: OpenPGP digital signature
