Hi Nilesh, Am Sat, Feb 19, 2022 at 02:34:16AM +0530 schrieb Nilesh Patra: > > I disabled the attempt `chown -c root.root` which is not permitted on > > one hand and not needed on the other hand since the resulting files > > inside the Debian package are owned by root anyway. > > Yeah, as we discussed in the debian-med video call as well. > Did you happen to test it a bit?
I checked the permissions in the final package. I'll also try to do some sensible stuff tomorrow. Since I've got a lintian (missing Apache NOTICE file - easy to fix) error I stumbled upon some unneeded code copies and wanted to make this a bit more clean. > > > Hope that helped. > > > > It helped a lot! > > > > Seems I got cocky now and realised that there is a new version 3.9.5 > > out. > > It always makes sense to look at the diff before you assume that nothing much > would've changed. > Seems they did major changes in what should essentially looks like a patch > release :( > Atleast the commit here[1] shows non-trivial changes > > [1]: > https://salsa.debian.org/hpc-team/singularity-container/-/commit/0d8440c61b866c7a8ac30739dcca2bff2b04897b You mean parameters: go-version: type: string default: '1.17.5' default: '1.17.6' ? > > I did not wanted to upload something that is outdated at the time > > I think it does make sense to first upload what you have at hand and what is > building for you. > It is atleast not worse than what we have currently. > > We can focus on new version after that -- well, atleast we are making > progress right. > > If you agree, please finalise 3.9.4; since 3.9.5 throws grpc/protobuf stuff > and it is almost never > straightforward to fix from my past experiences. > It just puts me off, I admit. You perfectly convinced me to target at 3.9.4. I'll try to finish this tomorrow and delay the switch to 3.9.5. > > I do not even see the grpc folder anywhere on salsa now. > > $ find . -name grpc | wc -l > 0 > > So I do not know where this error comes from; or if you have something else > locally. I'll simply revert the version bump ... > But in any case, I am a bit demotivated now to be spending time to fix this. > Hopefully someone else could chime in. Lets delay this for later. > > Please note that I've started to review the vendored copies and replaced > > two of these by the Debian packaged code. I'm not finished - just > > wanted to see if I'm breaking something. IMHO the breakage ist not > > caused by the removal of the vendored copies but I wanted to stress this > > point here. > > Leave the grpc/protobuf deps as it was vendored, I would suggest to not mess > around with these > unless you _really_ know what you are doing :) Yes - thanks a lot for your advise Andreas. -- http://fam-tille.de
