Hi Roger,

On 8/7/22 9:38 PM, Roger Shimizu wrote:
Sorry, I don't see any merit to RM the package your mentioned.
On Sat, Aug 6, 2022 at 8:50 PM Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> wrote:

Hi Alexandre,

Upstream of golang-github-templexxx-xor has moved to 
https://github.com/templexxx/xorsimd
and I recently did some work to get the new package accepted - It is now in 
archive[1]

golang-github-templexxx-xor has two reverse-deps

* golang-github-audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev -- This is compatible already 
with xorsimd and needs a tiny bit of work
* golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev - This is un-used and I have already asked for 
its removal.
For golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev, I maintain this package.
Why did you consider it's un-used?

This was a copy paste error, sorry. This is what I meant instead:

* golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev -- This is compatible already with xorsimd and 
needs a tiny bit of work
* golang-github-audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev - This is un-used and I have 
already asked for its removal.

Your package is _very_ relevant and has important reverse dependencies.
I asked for the removal of the
other (audriusbutkevicius-kcp-go-dev) package which has no reverse-deps, 
upstream source is missing so on..
I have asked for RM of this package (after getting permission from maintainer) 
in #1016705

And so, would it be okay if I ask for golang-github-templexxx-xor to be 
removed? -- You are
listed as the only one in "Uploaders" field here and I would like to get an ACK 
here.

[1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/golang-github-templexxx-xorsimd

Let me know.

If you want to RM the package, please make other packages working well.

I had uploaded golang-github-xtaci-kcp-dev (your package) with build-depends 
and depends on xorsimd along
with some minor polishing yesterday.
It works well -- please let me know if you have any concerns.

Other thank this, golang-github-templexxx-xor has no reverse-depends or 
reverse-build-deps. It's upstream has
moved to xorsimd and the development of former package is kind of abandoned, 
and hence I ask for its removal.

Let me know what you think / if you have any objections or comments.

--
Best,
Nilesh

Attachment: OpenPGP_signature
Description: OpenPGP digital signature

Reply via email to