On 12/24/2023 7:29 AM IST Maytham Alsudany <[email protected]> wrote: > > This is a package with a lot of (important) reverse-dependencies and this > > is a minor > > version (assuming they comply with semver.org) bump. > > Have you verified that it does not cause any regressions in the reverse-deps > > with ratt[1] or ruby-team/meta[2]? > > I haven't yet, but hopefully I can leave rutt to build the 127 reverse B-Deps. > I've changed d/control to Depend on either 1-3 or 1-5 of golang-github-golang- > protobuf (to resolve conflicts with golang-goprotobuf).
Do you need golang-github-google-s2a-go as a dependency for any other package? > I know that grpc is a pretty important package, so should golang-google-grpc > and > golang-github-google-s2a-go be uploaded to experimental instead of unstable? > Then, I can go through any packages that FTBFS or fail autopkgtest and ensure > nothing is broken. Updates of gRPC can usually never go to unstable directly. IMHO you probably should've pushed to d/experimental branch instead. > > [1]: https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/ratt > > [2]: https://salsa.debian.org/ruby-team/meta Best, Nilesh
