Hi! On Sat, 7 Dec 2024 at 05:45, Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> wrote: > On 07/12/24 5:37 pm, Simon Josefsson wrote: > > I think we exagerate the salsa CI load concerns. My perception is that > > while the Go package system is substantial, the churn is actually fairly > > low and building Go packages is much faster than most Debian packages. > > Remember that the CI only runs after a manual human commit and push. > > It usually takes more time for a human to think about and commit a > > change than CI consumes to run a pipeline for it. > > While I agree with this, I'd still prefer to err on the side of caution > and let the salsa CI admins know about this first. > > There are 1000+ packages in the team. This may cause a sudden spike.
By proposing to merge https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/infra/pkg-go-tools/-/merge_requests/2 I am erring on side on caution. After that is merged, it will be a very slow rollout as no package updates automatically, and even after a package has been updated to include this, a human needs to trigger the CI. The https://salsa.debian.org/go-team/infra/pkg-go-tools/-/merge_requests/2 has now two thumbs up. Who are the decision makers in the Go team, is there a specific person who should share ther opinion before we proceed? How long do you suggest I wait before merging it?
