On 21/08/25 12:48 am, Nilesh Patra wrote: > On 20/08/25 4:41 pm, Simon Josefsson wrote: >> Hi. I have uploaded 0.30.0-1 to experimental, but the amount of reverse >> build dependencies (~300?) scare me. Could anyone who knows this >> package look into if 0.30.0-1 would be fine for unstable? No urgency, >> I'm working on packages for NEW that may end up needing this, but having >> it in experimental is fine. > > You can consider to check britney pseudo excuses for your package: > https://release.debian.org/britney/pseudo-excuses-experimental.html > > It will give you some fair idea of what reverse-depends need fixing. > This will however give the full picture about reverse-build-depends, i.e. > if something FTBFS because of this package and is not relying on it > during autopkgtests.
s/however/however NOT/
