Otto Kekäläinen <[email protected]> writes: > Hi, > > I tested building dh-make-golang for both trixie-backports and > bookworm-backports. Trixie backport builds without any changes, but > Bookworm backport requires loosening the golang-any requirement.
Thanks for testing! I don't see a use for oldstable-backport. > I can backport dh-make-golang if there is a need for it, but I also > noticed it hasn't been done before. Do we want to start doing it now > and commit to publishing backports at regular intervals? Any objections to doing that? Even sporadic best-effort backport uploads seems better than none. What I'm looking for mostly is an indication that the latest dh-make-golang version is applicable to run in a stable environment -- which a backport perfectly signal -- because that is not trivial to evaluate for a mere user of the package. Otherwise I'll remain on the stable version, and looking at the changelog it seems I would then lack some new good features. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
