Nilesh Patra <[email protected]> writes: >>> Did we consider using a monorepo like the Rust team is doing for their >>> packages? You would store only the debian/ for each project in the >>> monorepo, not the entire upstream source code. Compare: > > I'd go in the other direction and would want to understand first as to > what are the benefits you think this serves us if we go ahead with a > monorepo?
Making automatic changes to larger number of packages. I also dislike monorepos for many reasons, but I guess I'm a bit frustrated about lack of tooling to automate package updates better, so I was curious if we ever discussed monorepos as it could make that easier, and I was kind of reaching for any solution available. /Simon
signature.asc
Description: PGP signature
