Hello Santiago, Bug filed against src:dh-golang: https://bugs.debian.org/1146815
A/B (Go 1.27.0 fixed): dh-golang 1.65 → PASS (golang-goji, golang-github-armon-go-metrics) dh-go 1.67 → FAIL (same packages; go.work / replace) So this looks like the dh-go 1.66/1.67 module-aware upload, not golang-1.27 alone. Helper: https://salsa.debian.org/-/snippets/871 Thanks for the rebuild logs. Hermes El sáb, 5 sept 2026 a las 11:55, Santiago Vila (<[email protected]>) escribió: > > [ replying to the list, as I'm subscribed ] > > On Sat, Sep 05, 2026 at 10:55:33AM -0400, Hermes Jesus Rodriguez Azuaje wrote: > > > Recurring failure modes in the sample: > > > > 1) replace to ./src/... without a go.mod at the replace target, e.g.: > > github.com/alecthomas/[email protected] (replaced by ./src/.../chroma): > > reading .../go.mod: no such file or directory > > (seen in gh, golang-github-armon-go-metrics, > > golang-github-awslabs-soci-snapshotter, …) > > > > 2) dh_auto_configure: > > No go.mod found for <import>, unable to create go.work file > > (packages still without go.mod) > > > > 3) dh_auto_build: > > Unable to open directory _build/src/.../vN > > (major-version path layout) > > > > 4) stricter module graph messages: > > "no required module provides package …" > > "module … is replaced but not required" > > Thanks a lot for this detailed analysis, hope you can include something > similar in the bug report. > > > So the root cause looks like golang-1.27 (+ dh-golang assuming the old > > replace/GOPATH-style workflow), not a simultaneous regression in 300 > > leaf packages. > > I am surprised because, in my opinion, we should try hard that the > number of FTBFS issues in unstable does not raise suddenly by 300 > packages at once without prior notice (even if the root cause is in a > single helper package). > > At some point I will probably end up posting a txt file with a list of > packages I can't build to [email protected] and pray that at > least someone else can fill the gaps. > > > I have not filed a bug yet; happy to if that helps. Candidates would be > > src:golang-1.27 and/or src:dh-golang, with the a.tar.gz as evidence. > > I forgot to point out that the bugs regarding golang-1.27 alone were already > reported by Tobias a few days ago, and they were only around 50 or so. > > So I guess it must be src:dh-golang. I leave the details to you. > > Thanks. >
