Martin-�ric Racine wrote: > > Sjoerd proposed to replace acme_error by g_warning; it *is* trivial. > > Patch attached. > > This patch fails as-is, because another patch removes that code fragment. Yes, it was done a bit too fast, Sjoerd pointed this in a later mail and announced he has a correct patch in his local package.
Frederic
--
To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED]
with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
