On Fri, Jan 28, 2005 at 06:39:48PM +0100, Sebastien Bacher wrote: > Le vendredi 28 janvier 2005 � 10:23 -0600, Ming Hua a �crit : > > > Sorry for being unclear. I was talking in the line of > > major.minor.patchlevel version, so by minor version upgrade I mean from > > 2.4.x to 2.6.x. The GTK+ IM modules are going to be installed in > > /usr/lib/gtk-2.0/2.6.0/ for GTK+ 2.6, aren't they? > > no, 2.6.0 and 2.6.1 in experimental still use 2.4.0 since the module > compability is not broken.
I see. Thanks for the clarification. It seems I don't need to worry about it for quite some time. However this still leave me wondering how the module compatibility is handled. Is there a easy way to check? The only thing I know is the SONAME of libgtk-x11-2.0.so (which I think isn't quite relevant) and libgtk2.0-0.shlibs (which is >= 2.4.4, but doesn't say when to change again, and it won't prevent broken upgrade anyway because of the >= dependency). [Please cc: me as I am not subscribed] Thanks again, Ming 2005.01.28 -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
