* "Raphael" == Raphael Hertzog <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Raphael> I think that we can use Incoming drectly since binary
Raphael> compatibility is assured for Gnome 1.0.50.
Oh, good.
Raphael> Furthermore, we don't have that much time for managing a
Raphael> staging area.
Well, the old one is still in place and usable. But as we can go the
direct way, it is not needed.
Here is something from the GNOME FAQ.
What order should I deal with the GNOME packages?
There is no one answer to this question, but here's an order that
should work well:
Debian
glib 1.2.4 OK
gtk+ 1.2.4 OK
imlib 1.9.7 OK
orbit 0.4.94 OK
gtk-doc
I think this is
Package: gtk-doc-tools
Section: devel
Maintainer: Steve Haslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
Source: gtk-doc
Version: 0+cvs19990528-2
Description: GTK documentation tools
These tools extract documentation embedded in GNOME source code, and
produce pretty output via DocBook SGML.
Someone will have to do a NMU.
libgtop 1.0.1 Ian Lynagh <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gtk-engines 0.5 Ed Boraas <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-libs 1.0.40 Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-core 1.0.7 Steve Haslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
control-center 1.0.5 Steve Haslam <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-print 0.7 Vincent Renardias <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
mc 4.5.38 OK
gnome-guile 0.99.0.cvs.19990627-1 James LewisMoss <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
gnome-python 1.0.4 Torsten Landschoff <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
(python-gnome in Debian)
gnome-objc We don't have this?
gtk-- 1.0.1 Marcus Brinkmann <[EMAIL PROTECTED]>
anything else, as needed, in whatever order
Looks easy doable. So, is there more that is part of the GNOME 1.0.50
release?
Ciao,
Martin
