"Martin Bialasinski" <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > * "Michael" == Michael Alan Dorman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Michael> Gtk---1.0.3.tar.gz > Marcus Brinkmann said on -devel he is ready and waiting for some gnome core > package to bu installed so he can recompile it (IIRC)
I'll check around---I haven't been keeping good track. I didn't realize I was going to be Debian's gnome-1.0.50 release co-ordinator until today. :-) > Michael> libghttp-1.0.4.tar.gz audiofile-0.1.9.tar.gz > Michael> xchat-1.2.1.tar.gz glib-1.2.5.tar.gz > Michael> gnumeric-0.38.tar.gz gnome-audio-1.0.0.tar.gz gtk+-1.2.5.tar.gz > Up to date in unstable. Does anyone know to what extent libghttp depends on anything else? In other words, are we going to want a recompile to gain some benefit from updated gnome-libs or some such? > mc 4.5.39 is in Incoming. As it now creates a third package > (mc-common), I don't expect it to be moved into potato until next year > ;) Well, gnome-libs was moved in pretty quickly, even though I foolishly created the gnome-faq package. So there is hope...:-) > bit skeptical about including gdm at all since the maintainer seems > AWOL.) Does anyone here have any feelings about gdm? I liked it, but when it broke several months ago, I just went back to xdm. I looked briefly at the package, but it's a beast. Given that even the upstream GNOME people seem pretty sour on it, should we try and have it yanked off ftp site? Mike.
