Christian Marillat wrote:

> >>>> "ACPI" == Adam C Powell IV <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
>
> ACPI> First, I would like to apologize for my messages to this list last
> ACPI> week.  The intentions behind them were good, and I still think most of
> ACPI> the content of the posts was useful, but I definitely crossed the line
> ACPI> from constructive criticism to unnecessarily harsh flaming.  After
> ACPI> all, we are all volunteers here.  Please accept my apology.
>
> Accepted.

Thank you.

> Now I need to know, if you can build the gnome-core package without gtkhtml ?

>From my last message:

Adam C Powell IV wrote:

> > I've enabled --enable-gtkhtml-help for user's request.
> >
> > ACPI> As a temporary workaround, I'll try building gnome-core without
> > ACPI> gtkhtml, so I at least have a functioning desktop.
> >
> > I think this should work.
> >
> > If this work I can remove --enable-gtkhtml-help and libgtkhtml dependencies.
>
> Okay, this all works, that is, it is possible to build gnome-core with
> --enable-gtkhtml-help and without gtkhtml installed.  (The configure.in is 
> intelligent
> enough to look for gtkhtml, and not finding it, to fall back on gtkxmhtml for
> gnome-help.)
>
> As to whether libgtkhtml should be removed as a dependency, I don't think 
> this should
> be done, even in spite of all of the gtkhtml build problems.  If the feature 
> enhances
> gnome-help, and can be built using existing Debian packages (at least in 
> theory), then
> it should probably be there.  (Maybe there should be Build-Suggests for this 
> type of
> issue? :-)
>
> On to another topic, I still feel it's odd to have gnome-control-center 
> depend on
> gnome-core, and wonder if this (binary) dependency should be removed.  It's 
> puzzling
> to be building and installing the source packages in the proper order and 
> have one of
> the built binaries be uninstallable because of a missing dependency- which 
> isn't
> supposed to be built yet.  But this is just my opinion, I don't see anything 
> in Policy
> on circular dependency.
>
> Thank you again for your helpful reply, and I will try to be more civil in 
> future
> posts.

-Adam P.

                  Welcome to the best software in the world today cafe!


Reply via email to