>> "DP" == Davide Puricelli <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes:
> On Sun, Jan 20, 2002 at 06:38:34PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: >> Hi again, > [snip] >> eog-0.109.1 0.6.6 Bug "Please consider to package eog 2" > ^^^^ > Before starting packaging it, I'd like to receive some info: > 1)Should I call it eog2 and keep eog package or just go ahead with eog > package? Should be called eog2, and don't forget to rename the tarball too. > 2)What I need now to compile my gnome packages? I mean, what new > packages should I install? Try a debuild :-) We have the following package : libart-2.0-dev libgnome2-dev libgnomeui-dev libglade2-dev libgnomeprint2-dev libgnomeprintui-dev libgnomevfs2-dev I'll add a task for Gnome 2 devel in the tasksel package this week. > 3)Can I upload to unstable or experimental is better? experimental is better, we will move all the Gnome 2 package in sid later (ie: when Gnome 2 will be more stable). Christian
