On 19 Mar 2002 18:00:35 +0100 Christian Marillat <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Most of our Gnome 2 packages are in unstable. Only some core Gnome 2 > packages are in experimental. even if katy has send some packages in > unstable (gnome-panel2) they're not going to woody, anyway... they're not stable enough for that > > I'd say we're all here "testing and developing the software". > > But some people are more stupid than me, and I'm sure we will receives bug > reports because ours packages aren't stripped. I'd say its more useful and productive to receive 'hey, you're not stripping it!' and mark them as 'won't fix' explainig the purpose of the packages *and* bug reports with debuging information than having to ask to each user to rebuild the whole thing with debugging symbols to send information that is really useful Come on, nautilus1.1, gnome-panel2 and all other gnome2 things crash *a lot*... they're not useful for use in a desktop machine, not even for those users that, like me, don't mind about an application crashing sometimes because it is beta software You guys have always done a very good work with gnome, I guess you're going to understand that helping with debug is more important than following policy at this moment... remember we're not releasing gnome2 to stable or testing anytime soon... > I want to heard some feedback from other Gnome 2 Debian maintainers > Takuo, Akira ? I don't count as a gnome2 maintainer, I know, but I develop with it and I have 1 of my packages already waiting to go to experimental which uses libpanel-applet2, I think it would be good to have debug symbols for libpanel-applet2 so that it is easier to me to find bugs in my package and in libpanel-applet2 []s! -- [EMAIL PROTECTED]: Gustavo Noronha <http://www.metainfo.org/kov> Debian: <http://www.debian.org> * <http://debian-br.cipsga.org.br>
