On Sat, 2002-06-08 at 12:39, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > On Wed, 2002-06-05 at 18:38, Colin Walters wrote: > >> Why not just upload to unstable, where it will be autobuilt? > > > I realized that we don't want to do this for packages which have the > > same name for GNOME 1 and GNOME 2; otherwise, when we replace GNOME 1 > > with GNOME 2 for woody+1, we'd be basically stuck with the "2" suffix, > > or a painful mass renaming. > > > We *are* planning to replace GNOME 1 with GNOME 2 for woody+1, right? > > I don't know. Fo now I don't like GNOME 2. Less configurable than GNOME > 1.4 (very annoying with sawfish).
Yes, everyone I've gotten to try G2 says the lack of configurability makes it horrible. The reason to remove those options is very sane - to make it easy for newbies. The GNOME guys just don't seem to want to accept tho that KDE is much more popular with newbies, and GNOME is the power-user's desktop... Ah well. It is stated that if certain options are requested enough, they'll be added back. So if there is something in particular, start b***hing about it on the GNOME Bugzilla. ~,^ Also, every few updates I notice more options being put in as the preference dialogs for them are designed. > > Then wait and see. > > Christian > > > -- > To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] > with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED] > -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
