On Sat, 2002-06-15 at 17:10, Joe Drew wrote: > [Disclaimer: As the maintainer of gedit, I have a bit of a vested > interest in this.] > > I can't really account for the way a some of GNOME 2 is being packaged, > at least with regard to applications and their package names. I count no > fewer than 9 applications which are being packaged with the "2" postfix: > control-center2 eog2 file-roller2 gdm2 gedit2 gnome-applets2 > gnome-games2 gnome-utils2 sawfish-gnome2
This has been extensively discussed on this list in the past week or so, and before that as well. > 2) Maintainer strife. Why does a new upstream version of a program, > dependent on a different set of libraries, give a new person the right > to take over a package? You should be the maintainer of the gedit2 package if you maintain gedit. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
