On Wed, 2002-06-19 at 11:09, Christian Marillat wrote: > >> "JN" == Jeremy Nickurak <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > > > Until we're at a point where the '2' can reliably be dropped from the > > gnome2 packages, should sawfish2 be providing sawfish, so as to meet the > > dependancy of, oh, for example, sawfish-xmms? That would be most > > appreciated. :) Or would it be the responsibility of sawfish-xmms to > > depend on either "version" of the package? > > No, sawfish should not depends on other package like this one. Certainly sawfish shouldn't depend on packages like that. But that other package depends on sawfish, which isn't available with a sawfish2 install. What I meant was, perhaps sawfish2 should Provide: sawfish as well.
-- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
