>> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, 2002-06-27 at 19:16, Jeff Waugh wrote: >> So, I strongly agree with the earlier discussion that involved conflicting >> package-name2 packages sitting alongside their package-name GNOME 1.x >> friends in unstable.
> Well, I agree. A mass-renaming should not be too difficult, and I > believe it will work. > Christian (as the maintainer of most of GNOME 2): what do you think? > Did you mean to upload gnome-terminal2 to unstable as "gnome-terminal"? > If not, then you'll have to add an epoch and re-upload 1.4. > If you did mean to do it, could you elaborate on your plans? As I said in my first post, I'll keep all the core packages (gnome-panel, gnome-applets, control-center, gnome-session) in experimenatl, because those packages will break all applications who are using an applet like gtm, gnomeicu, etc... I've uploaded gnome-terminal and sawfish in unstable, because those two packages are really better than the 1.x version and fix a lot of bugs. Christian -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
