On Sun, 2002-07-21 at 14:59, Joseph Carter wrote: > On Sun, Jul 21, 2002 at 12:35:45PM -0400, Joe Drew wrote: > > Unstable isn't for users. Period. By the time sarge releases we *will* > > have a transition between gnome 1.4->gnome 2 (via Ximian and Red Hat); > > until then, things can remain as they are. > > This is the most ass-backwards thing I've read on this list yet. You know > just as well as I do that users _do_ use sid.
Then, when it breaks, they can keep both pieces. It's not called "unstable" or "testing" for nothing. If you want a stable computer, woody is the one you want. For unstable and testing, GNOME 2 is the correct way to go. That's not to say that other people agree with this. I actually think for the core GNOME2 packages (like the panel, etc) it'd be better to have a transition from the *2 packages to the normal GNOME package names - but that's up to the maintainers of those packages. -- Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
