On Mon, 2002-07-22 at 18:24, Raphael Hertzog wrote: > Le Mon, Jul 22, 2002 at 09:18:56PM +0200, Julien Portalier �crivait: > > I do not see any real problem that would need to continue leaving gnome2 > > lost in experimental. Why not having both versions in unstable ? > > Because it's unnecessary work, and because it's an unneeded pain for most > applications. > > People who choose Gnome 1.4 won't be happy when Gnumeric will be > compiled with Gnome 2 libs ... and so on.
Eh? We can just keep the "2" suffix on packages, and there will be no conflict. gnumeric for GNOME 2 would be packaged as "gnumeric2", etc. The only legitimate reason I can see to keep GNOME 2 in experimental is so we can have our transition scripts tested against all the users running unstable when we do the mass-movement from experimental to unstable. I personally though am frustrated with experimental, because it's not autobuilt. -- To UNSUBSCRIBE, email to [EMAIL PROTECTED] with a subject of "unsubscribe". Trouble? Contact [EMAIL PROTECTED]
