On Tue, 2002-07-30 at 21:17, Chipzz wrote: > You're being inconsistent. On one side you claim gnome2 should be in un- > stable for testing, and on the other side you say broken apps should not > be inthe packages (even though they could be tested then).
Actually I have advocated putting packages which are ready for use in unstable, not everything which may or may not work. Being ready for use does not imply it couldn't use testing. -- Joe Drew <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> "This particular group of cats is mostly self-herding." -- Bdale Garbee
