On Mon, Aug 19, 2002 at 11:58:03PM +0200, [EMAIL PROTECTED] wrote: > X-Envelope-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Subject: gtk2 engine names > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > To: [email protected] > X-Spam-Status: No, hits=1.2 required=4.7 tests=NO_REAL_NAME version=2.01 > Resent-Message-ID: <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-From: [email protected] > X-Mailing-List: <[email protected]> archive/latest/3898 > List-Post: <mailto:[email protected]> > List-Help: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Subscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > List-Unsubscribe: <mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]> > Resent-Sender: [EMAIL PROTECTED] > Resent-Date: Mon, 19 Aug 2002 18:00:57 -0400 (EDT) > X-Keywords: > X-UID: 1939 > > gtk-engines-cleanice2 - CleanIce theme for GTK+ 2.x > gtk-engines-mgicchikn - Magic Chicken theme for GTK+ 2.x > gtk2-engines-thinice - ThinIce theme for GTK+ 2.0 > gtk2.0-engines-metal - Metallic theme for GTK+ 2.0 > gtk2.0-engines-pixbuf - Pixbuf-based theme for GTK+ 2.0 > gtk2.0-engines-redmond95 - Windows-like theme for GTK+ 2.0 > > what about a naming scheme for gtk2 engines: gtk2-engines-*?
I named my gtk-engines 1.9.0 packages gtk2.0-engines-* simply because the installed gtkrc is "gtkrc-2.0". If, indeed, it is intended for gtk+ 2.0 engines to be compatible with gtk+ 2.2, I can change that. (And yes, my gtk2.0-engines-* packages are installable alongside the gtk+1.2 gtk-engines-* packages.) -Ed
