Bart Schuller <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Tue, Oct 29, 2002 at 11:50:44PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote: > For me this is simply a big hack because metacity doesn't support Debian > menu and can have a better priority. In some point some old window > manager like fvwm are better than metacity.
> Why would a window manager have to support Debian menu? Metacity doesn't > display any menus except for manipulating windows. It's a window > manager, not a program launcher. A window manager should support key-bindings You loose a lot of time when you move your mouse. Configurable key-bindings are mandatory for a window manager. > It works fine as a window manager and great as a gnome2 window manager. I'm talking about x-window-manager priority (See policy 12.8.4.) Because metacity doesn't support Debian menu, his priority is 50 thus it can't supersed non Gnome window manager. Then gnome-wm take the first x-window-manager with the same priority. Christian
