> Trust me, you can't call it Bluecurve. ;-) > > I'm hoping to make a release with a "configure --with-name=Wonderland" > type of feature. I'm not sure I can convince automake to do this, but > worth a try. Otherwise you probably have to do "make install" and then > a lot of mv/sed action as part of the packaging. I could actually put > the mv/sed action in our spec file and leave the tarball name as > "Wonderland" instead of "Bluecurve"
So, it's really going to be a pain to have some people's machines calling this theme "Bluecurve" and others calling it "Wonderland". As an independent theme author, how can I base an enhanced theme on it reliably? It looks like any theme I write based on Wonderland will break for Red Hat users, so *they* will be the second class citizens in this instance. It may get to a point that Red Hat users will install Wonderland just to be compatible with everyone else. I grok the issues, and I accept Red Hat's use of trademarks, but this particular use does create a (small) world of pain... and I can't see a technical solution on the horizon. - Jeff
