On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 16:58, Michel D�nzer wrote: > On Die, 2002-11-12 at 18:20, James D Strandboge wrote: > > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 10:29, Sven Luther wrote: > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 10:26:22AM -0500, James D Strandboge wrote: > > > > On Tue, 2002-11-12 at 08:12, Sven Luther wrote: > > > > > On Tue, Nov 12, 2002 at 01:58:21PM +0100, Carlos Betancourt wrote: > > > > > > Any idea of when will Evo 1.2 hit sid? > > > > > > It has been officially released yesterday. > > > > > > http://www.ximian.com/about_us/press_center/press_releases/index.html?pr=evoluti > > > > > > on1_2 > > > > > > > > > > I guess it will not be until the maintainer has time for it. > > > > > > > > > > > > > The maintainer may already be working on it. I have tried to get > > > > evolution 1.2beta (and now 1.2 stable) to run on my sid box for weeks. > > > > It compiles fine, but segfaults on startup during calls to libc. Seems > > > > like a libc6 2.3 incompatibility issue which will most likely take > > > > (quite) a while to work out. > > > > > > So, they release buggy software, untested on the latest libc6 ? > > > > > Well, that may not be fair since nobody except debian sid is using the > > new libc6 IIRC, so we are the ones testing it! > > RH8 is based on a 2.3 prerelease... > Well I guess that blows my theory, unless parts of sid are still compiled against old libc and parts on new, or redhat has a heavily patched libc (but I am grasping-- I don't know why it won't run!). Has anyone been able to compile and run evolution 1.2 on a sid machine?
Jamie -- Email: [EMAIL PROTECTED] GPG/PGP ID: 26384A3A Fingerprint: D9FF DF4A 2D46 A353 A289 E8F5 AA75 DCBE 2638 4A3A Visit Perinton Nursery School at: http://perintonnurseryschool.org/
