On Tue, 2003-01-07 at 03:18, Akira TAGOH wrote: > >>>>> On 07 Jan 2003 01:52:49 -0500, > >>>>> "CW" == Colin Walters <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > CW> According to jamesh, we need pango 1.1 to fix this; AIUI, that implies > CW> we need GTK+ 2.2. So I guess we will just wait till Akira is back from > CW> vacation. > > I've uploaded Pango 1.2 and GTK+ 2.2 to the unstable. it > will be available soon.
This is a likely annoying and mostly unrelated question, but why are the packages called libgtk2.0_2.2* (or libglib2.0_2.2*, etc.) - it seems silly to me to declare the package the 2.0 variant, but at version 2.2... > > Regards, > -- > Akira TAGOH : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Japan GNOME Users Group > [EMAIL PROTECTED] : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / GNOME-DB Project > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Red Hat, Inc. > : [EMAIL PROTECTED] / Debian Project -- Sean Middleditch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> AwesomePlay Productions, Inc.
