[EMAIL PROTECTED] (Eloy A. Paris) writes: [...]
> What worries me is that the Nautilus developers seem to be adding more > and more features (new views, multi-rooted tree sidebar, etc.) instead > of focusing on performance. Nautilus still has a big memory footprint > (although it's better than in previous versions.) > > If Nautilus were to keep the current feature set, but made faster and > less memory-hungry, it would be _the_ file manager. My impression is that it is mostly other persons than the maintainers of Nautilus that have been working on those new features. And frankly I think it is still missing some features (e.g. filtered selection) to be a Real file manager. But then I grew up with Norton Commander. :-) -- Ole Laursen http://www.cs.auc.dk/~olau/
