Ryan Murray <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> writes: > On Thu, Feb 06, 2003 at 11:09:48PM +0100, Christian Marillat wrote:
[...] > Actively ? The last upload has been done the 4 Apr 2002. The BTS page > for gdm contains : > > 6 important bugs > 31 normal bugs > 2 minor bugs > 17 whishlist bugs > None of which are RC. None of which give you a reason to hijack the package. GNOME 2 has been release 6 months ago, an we are still waiting for a new gdm package. > The last change in the BTS has been done the 6 Apr 2002 for bug #141184 > abd I don't see any reply to a bug since this date. > Maybe you use a different BTS than I do, but I see activity from at > least October 2002, and January 2003. I've never received any reply to my bug #147637 filed 8 months ago... > Then, tell me how you call that ? > Why don't we stop worrying about what to call things (which benefits > no one), and worry about RC FTBFS packages in the gnome2 dep chain. I'm not concerned by that. All my packages are clean and if a receive a FTBFS bug I upload a new package within 2 days. > That benefits everyone. I've had some of those bugs (which are of RC > severity) ignored for 3 months, with uploads of "new upstream > release" happening in the meantime. I still don't see any good reason with the latest gdm isn't uploaded. Christian
