>>>>> On 19 Feb 2003 12:30:33 -0500, Sean Middleditch >>>>> <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> was rumoured to have said:
> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 11:55, Ross Burton wrote: >> On Wed, 2003-02-19 at 15:32, Johannes Rohr wrote: >> > Now, I asked the upstream author if it wasn't time to get Workrave >> > into Debian. He responded, he thinks that the policy doesn't permit >> > the upstream author and maintainer to be one and the same person. Is >> > this true? If yes, why? >> >> No, it doesn't say this. That would be rather stupid... >> >> I'll take this oppurtunity to plug DrWright, a no-frills program similar >> to Workrave but without the complex configuration. Compare >> http://workrave.sourceforge.net/gfx/prefs-timers.png to >> http://drwright.codefactory.se/images/drwright-preferences.png. > Ugh - if that Workrave screenshot is recent, someone should file a bug > that they aren't HIG compliant in the least, either. I just tried, but > I'm not going thru the effort of creating Yet Another Bugzilla Account > for one little app I never use. ;-) Workrave is not part of GNOME2, so I don't see why non-compliance to GNOME's HIG is a bug. Do you think authors of unrelated (but perhaps GNOME-aware) software should be pressured into doing gnome-type UIs Am I missing something here? >> >> Ross > -- > Sean Middleditch <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> Rgds, /-sb.
