On Mit, 2003-03-26 at 21:16, Alex Malinovich wrote: > On Tue, 2003-03-25 at 20:51, Michel D�nzer wrote: > > On Mit, 2003-03-26 at 02:26, Evan Martin wrote: > > > > > - there's some conflict between a header in libgal and an Evolution > > > header. they looked like they were both trying to prototype the same > > > function. > > > > Didn't encounter this, maybe because I used a post 1.3.1 CVS snapshot of > > evolution.
Now I have encountered this. :\ Looks like e_notice was moved from gal to evolution, so I'm building a gal CVS snapshot as well. > > Now the question is how to make what I have (a bunch of hacked up > > packages built from CVS snapshots) public without embarassing myself too > > much. :) I guess I'll take a while to put up slightly cleaned up source > > packages, please bear with me as I'm generally very busy at the moment. > > Since they wouldn't be official Debian packages anyway, I'd say just > throw them together for now so people can get at them. Just put a very > big disclaimer up saying that they may not, and most likely WILL not > work for everyone. Then you can clean it up later. :) I'll do something along those lines. The problem is I need to clean them up for them to even have a chance to build for someone else. :) I'm afraid my powerpc binaries aren't useful to most people here, and they're rather big for distribution anyway as I don't strip the evolution binaries. I'll do my best to provide source packages ASAP. > Oh, and since we're on the X-Mailer subject, check mine as well. :) I > built from the actual tarballs, though I'm thinking of rebuilding from > CVS soon to see if some of the little quirks have been taken care of > yet. It looks like some of the quirks are being taken care of indeed. :) -- Earthling Michel D�nzer (MrCooper)/ Debian GNU/Linux (powerpc) developer XFree86 and DRI project member / CS student, Free Software enthusiast
