El d�a 05 jun 2003, Ghe Rivero escrib�a: > Hi! > > Personally I think unstable would be a better target given the current > > migration of packages from unstable into testing. > > > > But that's just my 2 cents... > > > > Kind regards, > > > > Chipzz AKA > > Jan Van Buggenhout > > Well, your advice is welcomed, but is not our goal. Since next stable > version of Debian wil take ... a lot ... we just want one stable and > modern gnome desktop for debian woody. Yeah, we can use the ports that > are already make, but are they really stable? Today with 2.3.1 tomorrow > with the new one 2.3.2... No, thanks. we'll take XD as the base becNause > it's really a good improvement. That's all.
Unstable won't have any 2.3.x Gnome package. So the backport will be
as much as stable as Ximian Desktop once upstream include patches from
it, which I guess will happen in a few time. Even, mantainers can add
those patches in the interim.
IMO it's better for you use existing Woody backport and for for
improving it than starting a new complete one.
--
Jose Carlos Garcia Sogo
[EMAIL PROTECTED]
pgp8lXOl5CKVY.pgp
Description: PGP signature
